Case study / 01

Naming a venture built for a multi-planetary future.

A naming project for a hardware company with an ambitious brief: make fast, affordable and secure movement across the galaxy feel credible, advanced and ownable.

Sector
Hardware
Audience
Global
Character
Disruptive
Deliverable
3-name shortlist
01 / The brief

The name had to carry the ambition.

Build fast, affordable and secure rockets capable of moving people and goods across the galaxy.

Strategic ambition

Make life multi-planetary.

Naming challenge

Signal scientific credibility and scale without falling into generic aerospace language.

02 / Strategic territories

Three ways into the brief.

01

Energy / power

Language connected to controlled force, immense scale, propulsion and periodic energy.

02

Cosmic scale

Celestial language capable of expressing distance, exploration and a future beyond one planet.

03

Engineered progress

Compact, authoritative naming capable of feeling technical without becoming descriptive.

03 / The shortlist

Three finalists.

Each candidate expressed a different strategic interpretation of the same brief.

01

Pulsar

Recommended

Energy · Precision · Powerful · Advanced

Immediate scientific meaning with strong associations around energy, cycles and controlled power.

80 /100
02

Astrum

Visionary · Precision · Foundational · Advanced

A polished Latinate direction with strong scientific resonance and the strongest phonetic profile.

85 /100
03

Cosmar

Precision · Engineered · Robust · Modern

The most coined and intrinsically distinctive direction, with a technical and engineered character.

82 /100
04 / Decision

The highest score did not automatically win.

Astrum scored highest overall. Pulsar was selected because the recommendation was based on the strategic job of the name, not a single aggregate number.

Evaluation Pulsar Astrum Cosmar
Overall 80 85 82
Memorability 80 85 82
Phonetic strength 85 90 80
Strategic fit 85 82 78
Distinctiveness 75 78 85
Verb potential 80 80 90
Length efficiency 100 95 100
05 / Final recommendation

Proceed to deeper clearance

Pulsar

A high-potential name with inherent gravitas.

Strong phonetic construction, a relevant scientific semantic core and the strongest strategic-fit score made Pulsar the preferred direction despite another candidate leading the aggregate ranking.

Strategic fit 85 / 100
Takeaway

Evidence informs the decision. It does not replace judgment.

A shortlist is useful when the differences between names are visible. The purpose of scoring is not to crown a winner automatically—it is to make the trade-offs explicit enough for a recommendation to be challenged and defended.

Your naming decision

Build a shortlist you can defend.